Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (2):113-121 (2012)

Abstract
As a leading measure of journal quality, acceptance rates of journals can influence faculty recruitment, salary, tenure and promotion decisions; subscription decisions; and authors’ intention to submit manuscripts. Recent literature from both the Communication and Hospitality Management disciplines suggests that there are wide differences in the formulas used by editors to calculate acceptance rates. Because differing methods of acceptance rate calculation potentially impact significant decisions, a universally accepted and applied standard could be developed. A normative standard, grounded in a specific core ethical principle, is generally preferable to a nonfoundational approach. Two primary approaches to the study of ethics have prevailed through time, teleological ethics with a focus on consequences as represented by Mill’s Utilitarian ideals and deontological ethics with a focus on duty as represented by Kant’s Categorical Imperative. This analysis applies these two ethical frameworks, utility and duty, to the journal editors’ dilemma of finding a common, normative method to calculate acceptance rates
Keywords Journal acceptance rates  Editor ethics  Academic tenure  Academic promotion  Journal quality
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10805-012-9158-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toward a Foundational Normative Method in Business Ethics.Lester F. Goodchild - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):485 - 499.
Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Michael Ridge - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242 - 253.
Belief Versus Acceptance.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):122 – 137.
Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.
The Norms of Acceptance.Joëlle Proust - 2012 - Philosophical Issues 22 (1):316-333.
Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions.Gene R. Laczniak & Patrick E. Murphy - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (4):259 - 271.
Moral Autonomy and the Rationality of Science.James C. Gaa - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):513-541.
Can Science Justify an Ethical Code?William T. Blackstone - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):118 – 127.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-12

Total views
83 ( #140,053 of 2,506,531 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,531 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes