Jaspers, the Axial Age, and Christianity

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):239-254 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Karl Jaspers celebrates the “Axial Age” as marking a fundamental advance in humanity’s self-understanding, but rejects Christianity as “fettering” this new enlightenment to a notion of Jesus as the sole incarnation of the divine. Here I try to show that, relative to Jaspers’ own account of Existenz and especially of existential “foundering,” Jesus becomes distinctive in a way that Socrates, Buddha, and Confucius are not (even on Jaspers’ own accounts of these four “paradigmatic individuals”). I go on to show how, on Karl Rahner’s inclusivist account of theincarnation, Jaspers’ objections to Christianity mostly dissolve. Finally, I suggest the need to recognize two Axial Age traditions: one rejecting sacrificial forms in favor of ethical prescriptions, the other finding new ethical meaning in these older forms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between facts and myth: Karl Jaspers and the actuality of the axial age.Andrew Smith - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (4):315-334.
The Axial Age and Modernity.Vittorio Cotesta - 2017 - ProtoSociology 34:217-240.
Revisiting Karl Jaspers's Axial Age Hypothesis.Robert F. Gorman - 2015 - Catholic Social Science Review 20:99-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
34 (#544,776)

6 months
4 (#1,160,356)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references