Reclaiming Meaning, Reclaiming Normativity

Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):216-218 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I dispute Heras-Escribano’s reasons for denying that affordances are normative by offering an alternative reading of Wittgenstein’s considerations in which there is room for nonsocial but …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reclaiming Sodom.Rocky O'Donovan - 1994 - In Jonathan Goldberg (ed.), Reclaiming Sodom. Routledge. pp. 247--48.
Reclaiming Epicurus [Book Review].Rosslyn Ives - 2014 - Australian Humanist, The 113:21.
Are affordances normative?Manuel Heras-Escribano & Manuel de Pinedo - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
Kant on Ends and the Meaning of Life.Thomas Pogge - 1997 - In Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, Christine M. Korsgaard & John Rawls (eds.), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge University Press. pp. 361--87.
Are affordances normative?Manuel Pinedo & Manuel Heras-Escribano - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
What is the Normativity of Meaning?Daniel Whiting - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):219-238.
Semantic normativity.Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (2):203-26.
Semantic Normativity and Naturalism.Claudine Verheggen - 2011 - Logique Et Analyse 54 (216):553-567.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-06

Downloads
15 (#929,240)

6 months
3 (#992,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references