The Aesthetic Status of Art Reproductions

British Journal of Aesthetics 5 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Only a completely faithful reproduction can be considered as a full aesthetic equivalent of an original artwork. Moreover, Even an ideal reproduction representing a complete likeness of the original for aesthetic experience cannot impinge on the ontological-Historical uniqueness of the original. (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategies of irreproducibility.Emanuele Arielli - 2019 - Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 11:60-76.
The status of the aesthetic clone.Thomasine Kushner - 1980 - Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (3-4):309-318.
The aesthetic attitude.Herbert Sidney Langfeld - 1920 - Port Washington, N.Y.,: Kennikat Press.
Replicating Paintings.Matteo Ravasio - 2018 - Contemporary Aesthetics 16.
The Aesthetic Sentiment; A Criticism and an Original Excursion.Karl Aschenbrenner - 1942 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (5):62-64.
Aesthetics and Perception.Günter Figal - 2015 - In Niall Keane & Chris Lawn (eds.), A Companion to Hermeneutics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 155–161.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Monika Bokiniec - 2009 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):75-96.
Mieczysław Wallis: Experience and Value.Monika Bokiniec - 2009 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):75-96.
The aesthetic status of forgeries.Mark Sagoff - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (2):169-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
10 (#1,207,573)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references