In Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora & Gonzalo Villa Rosas (eds.), Conceptual Jurisprudence: Methodological Issues, Conceptual Tools, and New Approaches. Dordrecht, Netherlands: (2021)

Authors
Lucas Miotto
University of Maastricht
Abstract
The assumption that coercion is largely responsible for our legal systems’ efficacy is a common one. I argue that this assumption is false. But I do so indirectly, by objecting to a thesis I call “(Compliance)”, which holds that most citizens comply with most legal mandates most of the time at least partly in virtue of being motivated by legal systems’ threats of sanctions and other unwelcome consequences. The relationship between (Compliance) and the efficacy of legal systems is explained in section 1. There I also show that (Compliance) must be rejected for it relies on unsubstantiated empirical assumptions. In section 2, I claim that an alternative, and more refined, formulation of (Compliance) also lacks adequate support. I conclude with a few general remarks about the centrality of coercion in our thought and talk about legal systems.
Keywords Coercion  Compliance  Obedience  Legal Philosophy  General Jurisprudence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Law and Coercion: Some Clarification.Lucas Miotto - 2021 - Ratio Juris 34 (1):74-87.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Makes Law Coercive When It is Coercive.Lucas Miotto - 2021 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 107 (2):235-250.
Law and Coercion.Robert C. Hughes - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):231-240.
Coercion and the Nature of Law.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
Legal Coercion, Respect & Reason-Responsive Agency.Ambrose Y. K. Lee - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):847-859.
“The Role of Coercion in Law: The Case of International Law.”.Sandra Raponi - 2016 - Washington University Jurisprudence Review 8 (1).
Corporate Governance: An Ethical Perspective.Surendra Arjoon - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):343-352.
The Many Forces in Law: Rational, Physical and Psychological Coercion.Jorge Núñez - 2019 - In Frederick Schauer, Christoph Bezemek & Nicoletta Bersier Ladavac (eds.), The Normative Force of the Factual: Legal Philosophy Between is and Ought. Springer Verlag. pp. 135-149.
Non-Voluntary Compliance.Steven Jay Gold - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:115-120.
Non-Voluntary Compliance.Steven Jay Gold - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:115-120.
H. L. A. Hart on Legal Obligation.Adejare Oladosu - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (2):152-176.
Legal Science: The Demarcation Problem and the Perimeter of “Good Science”.David Duarte - 2019 - In David Duarte, Pedro Moniz Lopes & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge. Springer Verlag. pp. 211-251.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-05

Total views
115 ( #101,557 of 2,505,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #19,412 of 2,505,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes