Samantha Burton and the Rights of Pregnant Women Twenty Years afterIn re A. C

Hastings Center Report 40 (6):13-15 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1987, a young woman named Angela Carder, pregnant and dying from cancer, was ordered by a court of law to undergo a cesarean delivery against her and her family’s wishes. She and her baby both died. Three years later, an appeals court took an extraordinary stand: it vacated the order that ended their lives and upheld pregnant women’s rights to informed consent and bodily integrity. The “unkindest cut of all,”1 it seemed, had been condemned by the courts.2 Yet shortly before the twenty-year anniversary of this landmark case, the same rights were stripped from another young pregnant woman. In January of this year, oral arguments were heard in the case of Samantha Burton. She had been twenty-five weeks ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion without free and informed consent? An austrian case of first impression.Erwin Bernat - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):311 – 321.
Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict. [REVIEW]Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):38-38.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation.Iris Marion Young - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):45-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-12

Downloads
58 (#271,353)

6 months
17 (#142,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?