Subhumans, human flourishing and abortion: a reply to Räsänen

Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article, I argued that all humans are morally equal, and that this generates an argument against abortion. Here, I defend my argument against two objections from Räsänen: that it is possible to ground equal human value in the ability to flourish in a particular kind of way, and that being human is not, in fact, a binary property in the way needed for the argument to work. I show that this proposed criterion for grounding human value falls prey to my original argument, and that Räsänen’s attempt to conceive of subhuman entities fails.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-23

Downloads
32 (#486,933)

6 months
18 (#192,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Calum Miller
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller.Joona Räsänen - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (10):717-718.
Human equality arguments against abortion.Calum Miller - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (8):569-572.
Abortion and Moral Risk.D. Moller - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):425-443.
Fetuses, Orphans, and a Famous Violinist.Gina Schouten - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (3):637-665.

Add more references