Morality in a Branching Universe

Disputatio 1 (20):1 - 21 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In most cases, we think that what settles what act it is right to perform is sensitive to what we take the facts about the world to be. But those facts include many controversial metaphysical claims about the world. I argue that depending on what metaphysical model we take to be correct, we will have very different views about what the right actions are. In particular, I argue that if a particular metaphysical model — the branching universe model — is correct, then many of our ethical intuitions are false. We need to think carefully about the relation between ethical and metaphysical intuitions, and ethical and metaphysical theories.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-06

Downloads
136 (#139,727)

6 months
484 (#3,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristie Miller
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Foreknowledge and Fatalism : Why Divine Timelessness Doesn’t Help.Alan R. Rhoda - 2014 - In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 253-274.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Theories of actuality.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1974 - Noûs 8 (3):211-231.
Time and Space.Barry Dainton - 2001 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Theories of Actuality.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1979 - In Michael J. Loux (ed.), The Possible and the actual: readings in the metaphysics of modality. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. pp. 190.

View all 17 references / Add more references