John Skorupski, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 19 (6):447-451 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Stuart Mill as Philosopher.Jan Narveson - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (2):315-.
John Skorupski, John Stuart Mill Reviewed by.Alan Millar - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (5):357-360.
John Skorupski, Why Read Mill Today? Reviewed by.Mike Hinds - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (3):226-228.
Mill still thrills. [REVIEW]Michel Petheram - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 36:91-91.
Why Read Mill Today?Skorupski John - 2006 - New York: Routledge.
Why read Mill today.John Skorupski - 2006 - New York: Routledge.
Civilization and culture as moral concepts.John Robson - 1998 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge University Press. pp. 338--371.
Mill on psychology and the moral sciences.Fred Wilson - 1998 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge University Press. pp. 203--54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-15

Downloads
2 (#1,793,260)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dale E. Miller
Old Dominion University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references