French Civil Partnership Contract

Seeu Review 14 (1):134-159 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A civil partnership is a legally recognized relationship between two people of the same sex or the opposite sex that offers many of the same benefits as a conventional marriage. Before addressing the specificities of the French civil partnership contract, designated as a civil covenant of solidarity, commonly known as PACS, it is necessary to define and explain the origin of this type of contract. The conclusion of a PACS, despite the fact that it is less formal than marriage, implies the respect of certain conditions of substance and form during its formation and its modification. Recently, PACS has undergone changes on this point, through a simplification of the rules of form with the establishment of its statement and registration by the registrar, removing the court clerk’s intervention. Once the PACS is concluded, with the main purpose of organizing the couple’s common life, this contract produces personal, pecuniary and patrimonial effects between the partners. As the PACS is legally only a contract, it can be dissolved by the appearance of four events. When PACS is dissolved, consequences result for the situation of the partners because they must proceed to the liquidation of the property they own and also repay the debts incurred during the period of their living together. If the dissolution of PACS is caused by the death of one of the partners, then particular consequences will affect the situation of the surviving partner. In fact, couples who entered into a PACS are not considered heirs in the eyes of the law. However, there are alternatives preventing the application of this principle, but they must be realized during the lifetime of the partners.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Not (quite) a horse and carriage.Carl F. Stychin - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (1):79-86.
Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project.Simone Wong - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (2):145-166.
The Registrar in the John Lewis Partnership: a Lesson in Loyalty.Pauline Graham - 1992 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 1 (3):185-191.
The registrar in the John Lewis partnership: A lesson in loyalty.Pauline Graham - 1992 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 1 (3):185–191.
Transfer of the Rights of Succession (text only in Lithuanian).Asta Dambrauskaitė - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):111-133.
Autonomy and Authority in Kant's Rechtslehre.Kevin E. Dodson - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (1):93-111.
The Legal Definition of Contract and Its Rational Roots in Iran.Abbas Nazifi - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (2):417-425.
Взаємодія людини і суспільства як гарантія розвитку громадянського суспільства.Svetlana Sydorenko - 2017 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 68:121-129.
Acknowledging the Purpose of Partnership.Stuart Macdonald & Tom Chrisp - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):307-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-10

Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references