Law and Critique 14 (3):277-295 (2003)

Authors
Thomas Mertens
Radboud University Nijmegen
Abstract
The small article “Statutory Injustice and Suprastatutory Law” published in 1946 by Gustav Radbruch is one of the most important texts in 20th century legal philosophy. Until recently, its importance was said to stem from its renewal of ‘natural law’ and from its ‘formula’, according to which the value of justice should override that of legal certainty in extreme cases. In this contribution, a close examination will show that Radbruch's text is less univocal than often suggested. I argue that Radbruch deals here with the acute problems of apparent criminal legality during the Nazi-era rather than with problems of validity. In order to make this clear, I first briefly sketch Radbruch's personal history and the context into which the article fits. Secondly, I analyze the text itself and focus on how to understand the well-known grudge informer case. Finally, I pay some attention to the renewed topical interest of Radbruch's formula, owing to the fact that it was used in the trials against former-GDR soldiers who shot fugitives at the Berlin Wall,and their superiors.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1023/b:lacq.0000005215.60293.99
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).Radbruch Gustav - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1):1-11.
Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis.David Plunkett - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):563-605.
Reconstructing Relativism: An Analysis of Radbruch's Philosophy of Law.Jan-R. Sieckmann - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 95 (1):14-27.
Reconstructing Relativism. An Analysis of Radbruch's Philosophy of Law.Jan-R. Sieckmann - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 95 (1):14-27.
Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral.Andrei Marmor - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):683-704.
Schmegality. [REVIEW]William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):273-291.
Legal Positivism.Mario Jori (ed.) - 1992 - New York University Press.
Radbruch und Kantorowicz.Frank Saliger - 2007 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 93 (2):236-251.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-28

Total views
13 ( #769,307 of 2,507,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,781 of 2,507,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes