Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals

Ratio Juris 27 (2):190-217 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay discusses the import of the separability thesis both for legal positivism and for contemporary legal practice. First, the place of the separability thesis in legal positivism will be explored, distinguishing between “standard positivism” and “post‐Hartian positivism.” Then I will consider various kinds of relations between law and morality that are worthy of jurisprudential interest, and explore, from a positivist point of view, what kind of relations between law and morality must be rejected, what kind of such relations should be taken into account, and what kind of such relations are indeed of no import at all. The upshot of this analysis consists in highlighting the distinction between two different dimensions of legal validity (formal validity and material validity respectively), and in pointing out that the positivist separability thesis can apply to formal validity only. On the other hand, when the ascertainment of material validity is at stake, some form of moral reasoning may well be involved (here and now, it isnecessarilyinvolved). The essay concludes with some brief remarks on the persisting importance of the positivist jurisprudential project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Separability Thesis: A Comparison Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism.Owen Jeffrey Crocker - 2022 - Sophia: Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):60-71.
The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism.Robert Alexy - 2002 - Oxford ;: Oxford University Press UK.
On the concept and the nature of law.Robert Alexy - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (3):281-299.
Moral Passion and Legal Positivism: Reply to Anton Didikin.A. Nekhaev - 2019 - Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity 4 (4):94–111.
Existence and Justification Conditions of Law.Michael Giudice - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (1):23-40.
Argument From Injustice: A Reply.Robert Alexy - 2009 - Oxford ;: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
116 (#186,046)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Law and disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The morality of law.Lon Luvois Fuller - 1969 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

View all 81 references / Add more references