Testosterone-aggression relationship: An exemplar of interactionism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):380-381 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mazur & Booth provide life scientists with an example of the multilevel biopsychosocial approach. Research paradigms have to become more flexible and multidisciplinary if we are to free ourselves from the nature–nurture dichotomy that we have long agreed was simplistic and shortsighted. I point out a variety of kinds of interactions that may be the next frontier for behavioral scientists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testosterone and the concept of dominance.James M. Dabbs - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
Primacy of organising effects of testosterone.Anne Campbell, Steven Muncer & Josie Odber - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):365-365.
Why is testosterone associated with divorce in men?Elizabeth Cashdan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):366-366.
Old issues and new perspectives on testosterone research.Alan Booth & Allan Mazur - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):386-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#798,463)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references