Mark Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism: agent-neutrality, moral epistemology, and methodology [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 157 (3):445-453 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Symposium contribution on Mark Schroeder's Slaves of the Passions. Argues that Schroeder's account of agent-neutral reasons cannot be made to work, that the limited scope of his distinctive proposal in the epistemology of reasons undermines its plausibility, and that Schroeder faces an uncomfortable tension between the initial motivation for his view and the details of the view he develops.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11098-010-9657-2

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Shafer-Landau, Mcpherson, and Dancy. [REVIEW]Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):463-474.
Précis of Slaves of the Passions. [REVIEW]Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):431-434.
Response to Mark Schroeder’s Slaves of the passions. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):455-462.
Hypotheticalism and the objectivity of morality.Kelly Heuer - manuscript
Precis of When Truth Gives Out. [REVIEW]Mark Richard - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):441-444.
On Mark Schroeder's Hypotheticalism: A Critical Notice of Slaves of the Passions.David Enoch - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (3):423-446.
Reply to MacFarlane, Scharp, Shapiro, and Wright. [REVIEW]Mark Richard - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):477-495.
Humean agent-neutral reasons?Daan Evers - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):55 – 67.
Replies to McKenna, Pereboom, and Kane.Mark Balaguer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies (1):1-22.
Stakes, withholding, and pragmatic encroachment on knowledge.Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):265 - 285.
Review of mark Schroeder, Slaves of the Passions. [REVIEW]David Sobel - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
In defense of moral testimony.Paulina Sliwa - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):175-195.
Simplicity made difficult. [REVIEW]John MacFarlane - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (3):441 - 448.
On Fischer’s Our Stories. [REVIEW]Derk Pereboom - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):523-528.
Fischer on death and unexperienced evils. [REVIEW]Ben Bradley - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):507-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
1,777 (#5,393)

6 months
135 (#27,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tristram McPherson
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Epistemic instrumentalism, permissibility, and reasons for belief.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2018 - In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.), Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford University Press. pp. 260-280.
Epistemic Instrumentalism and the Too Few Reasons Objection.Charles Côté-Bouchard - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):337-355.
The Reasoning View and Defeasible Practical Reasoning.Samuel Asarnow - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (3):614-636.
Prudence, Morality, and the Humean Theory of Reasons.Eden Lin - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):220-240.
Still waiting for a plausible Humean theory of reasons.Nicholas Shackel - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):607-633.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Slaves of the passions.Mark Andrew Schroeder - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references