The return of the Inseminator: Eutelegenesis in past and contemporary reproductive ethics

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):393-410 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.03.006

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The return of the Inseminator: Eutelegenesis in past and contemporary reproductive ethics.John McMillan - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):393-410.
The return of the Inseminator: Eutelegenesis in past and contemporary reproductive ethics.John McMillan - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):393-410.
Current and future issues in assisted reproduction.LeRoy Walters - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):383-387.
Beyond choice: reproductive freedom in the 21st century.Alexander Sanger - 2004 - New York: Public Affairs.
Reproductive Information and Reproductive Decision‐Making.Maxwell J. Mehlman - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):241-244.
Eutelegenesis.Herbert Brewer - 1935 - The Eugenics Review 27 (2):121.
Eutelegenesis and sterility.Herbert Brewer - 1937 - The Eugenics Review 28 (4):343.
How Does Leopold Bloom Become Ulysses?John Turner - 2014 - Philosophy and Literature 38 (1):41-57.
How to Escape the Doctor's Dilemma? De‐Medicalize Reproductive Technologies.Paul A. Lombardo - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):326-329.
The Limits of Reproductive Decisions.Ged M. Murtagh - 2004 - Human Studies 27 (4):417-427.
Why counterpart theory and modal realism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):650-653.
Response to "May a Woman Clone Herself" by Jean Chambers.Timothy F. Murphy - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):83-86.
Is it “every man's right to have babies if he wants them”?: Male pregnancy and the limits of reproductive liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 275-299.
Women and new reproductive.New Reproductive - 1992 - In Helen B. Holmes & Laura Purdy (eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Indiana University Press. pp. 695--167.
Selecting children: The ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-25

Downloads
8 (#1,312,052)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Between the farm and the clinic: agriculture and reproductive technology in the twentieth century.Sarah Wilmot - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):303-315.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references