‘Cambridge Change’: a Response to Leudar and Sharrock

History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):107-110 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making up the past: a response to Sharrock and Leudar.Steve Fuller - 2002 - History of the Human Sciences 15 (4):115-123.
Indeterminacy in the past?Wes Sharrock & Ivan Leudar - 2002 - History of the Human Sciences 15 (3):95-115.
Changing the Past?Ivan Leudar & Wes Sharrock - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (3):105-121.
Under a Redescription.Kevin McMillan - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):129-150.
Can the dead be brought into disrepute?Malin Masterton, Mats G. Hansson, Anna T. Höglund & Gert Helgesson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):137-149.
Kuhn on reference and essence.Alexander Bird - 2004 - Philosophia Scientiae 8 (1):39-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
81 (#206,810)

6 months
2 (#1,198,893)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin McMillan
University of Ottawa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

I*—The Presidential Address: Shooting, Killing and Fatally Wounding.Alan R. White - 1980 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80 (1):1-16.
Changing the Past?Ivan Leudar & Wes Sharrock - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (3):105-121.

Add more references