The Moral Object in the "Phoenix Case": A Defense of Sister McBride's Decision

Christian Bioethics 18 (3):301-311 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “Phoenix Case” brought into public scrutiny a contemporary debate in Catholic moral theology over competing views on the relation of the object of the act to the physical structure of acts that arise from moral choices. A procedure that was described by hospital officials and their parent company as an indirect abortion was judged by the local ordinary, Bishop Thomas Olmsted, as a direct abortion. A debate ensued between Bishop Olmsted and Catholic Health Care West and their advisors. Eventually, Bishop Olmsted excommunicated Sister Margaret Mary McBride for her role on the ethics committee approving the procedure and publicly announced his refusal to recognize the hospital as authentically Catholic. This author addresses the theological position of the hospital and addresses implications for other professionals in Catholic health care facing similar dilemmas

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-24

Downloads
70 (#239,830)

6 months
12 (#243,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Catholic bioethics and the gift of human life.William E. May - 2008 - Huntington, Ind.: Our Sunday Visitor.
Is A Purely First Person Account Of Human Action Defensible?Christopher Tollefsen - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4):441-460.
Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Vital Conflicts and Virtue Ethics.Benedict M. Guevin - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (3):471-480.

Add more references