The Descent of Science

Review of Metaphysics 52 (4):835 - 866 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

AMONG THE BEINGS KNOWN TO US, the human being is, so far as we are aware, the only one to trouble himself about his origins. Mountains have no more care for such matters than it is in their power to leap like rams. As for the rams, they have perhaps some mute memory of their parents, and some abiding affection for them, yet they clearly lack all ambition to retrace the steps of their ovine past. We alone desire to know whence we came. It is true that some among us manifest this desire in an obsession about “ethnic origins,” for example, but this need not signify that our interest in our predecessors must be a purely parochial affair. While a concern for our past seems to be peculiar to our species, and while it necessarily finds its initial expression in questions about our immediate precursors, origins being what they are, we cannot long wonder about our own without soon having to consider the origins of the whole human race, and of everything else besides.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descent systems and ideal language.Rodney Needham - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):96-101.
“Curiously parallel”: Analogies of language and race in Darwin's descent of man. A reply to Gregory Radick.Stephen G. Alter - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):355-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
21 (#737,450)

6 months
3 (#976,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John C. McCarthy
Catholic University of America

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references