Error, tests and theory confirmation

&
In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. pp. 125-154 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Error, tests and theory confirmation.John Worrall - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125-154.
The Book of Evidence. [REVIEW]Stathis Psillos - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):740-743.
How Strong is the Confirmation of a Hypothesis by Significant Data?Thomas Bartelborth - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):277-291.
The Simplicity of Disproving the Theory of Special Relativity.Denis Thomas - 2022 - Science and Philosophy 10 (1):111-120.
The Confirmation of Quantitative Laws.Henry E. Kyburg - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):1-22.
From relative confirmation to real confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Significance Tests: Vitiated or Vindicated by the Replication Crisis in Psychology?Deborah G. Mayo - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1):101-120.
In defence of error theory.Chris Daly & David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):209-230.
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge.Deborah G. Mayo - 1996 - University of Chicago.
Error and inference: an outsider stand on a frequentist philosophy.Christian P. Robert - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):447-461.
Review of Deborah G. Mayo, Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. [REVIEW]Adam La Caze - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Why is Bayesian confirmation theory rarely practiced.Robert W. P. Luk - 2019 - Science and Philosophy 7 (1):3-20.
What Is the Point of Confirmation?Franz Huber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-28

Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Deborah Mayo
Virginia Tech
Aris Spanos
Virginia Tech

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references