Argument Explanation Complementarity and the Structure of Informal Reasoning

Informal Logic 30 (1):92-111 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argument and explanation are distinct forms of reasoning with an underappreciated complementary relationship. In this essay I define these terms precisely, identify the mischief that results from conflating them, elucidate their complementary relationship and employ this relationship to provide a fruitful approach to analyzing the logical structure of the common editorial.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
99 (#172,178)

6 months
19 (#182,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Abduction in argumentation frameworks.Chiaki Sakama - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):218-239.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references