Understanding Social Systems?

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):187-188 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Social Autopoiesis?” by Hugo Urrestarazu. Upshot: In my commentary I reflect on conceptual and epistemological questions. In particular, I challenge the idea of trying to define social systems. I also wonder whether in many cases autopoiesis is carelessly used as a mere synonym for self-organization

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communication, Autopoiesis and Semiosis.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):183-185.
The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Human Autopoiesis?A. Kravchenko - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):177-179.
Freedom and Constraints.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):186-186.
When Theoretical Frameworks Collide.D. Laflamme - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):167-168.
Communication is Meaning-based Autopoiesis.D. Laflamme - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):192-194.
What Is Sociology?H. R. Maturana - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):176-179.
Against a Reductive Materialism of the Social.P. Berger - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):172-174.
Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning.A. Karafillidis - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
27 (#142,020)

6 months
27 (#573,316)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references