Against a Reductive Materialism of the Social

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):172-174 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Social Autopoiesis?” by Hugo Urrestarazu. Upshot: Hugo Urrestarazu’s social theoretical concept is reduced to the material reality. These suggestions exclude the essential constructivist character of the social and thereby important social phenomena by definition. The systems theoretical approach by Niklas Luhmann offers an adequate alternative

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communication, Autopoiesis and Semiosis.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):183-185.
When Theoretical Frameworks Collide.D. Laflamme - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):167-168.
The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Social Systems: Unearthing the Big Picture.S. J. Cowley & V. Raimondi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):179-181.
Understanding Social Systems?H. R. Maturana - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):187-188.
Human Autopoiesis?A. Kravchenko - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):177-179.
Freedom and Constraints.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):186-186.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning.A. Karafillidis - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
3 (#1,733,782)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references