Samantha Matherne
Harvard University
In spite of Ernst Cassirer’s criticisms of psychologism throughout Substance and Function, in the final chapter he issues a demand for a “psychology of relations” that can do justice to the subjective dimensions of mathematics and natural science. Although these remarks remain somewhat promissory, the fact that this is how Cassirer chooses to conclude Substance and Function recommends it as a topic worthy of serious consideration. In this paper, I argue that in order to work out the details of Cassirer’s psychology of relations in Substance and Function, we need to situate it within two broader frameworks. First, I position Cassirer’s view in relation to the view of psychology and logic endorsed by his Marburg Neo-Kantian predecessors, Hermann Cohen and Paul Natorp. Second, I augment Cassirer’s early account of the psychology of relations in Substance and Function with the more mature view of psychology that he presents in The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. By placing Cassirer’s account within these contexts, I claim that we gain insight into his psychology of relations, not just as it pertains to mathematics and natural science, but to culture as a whole. Moreover, I maintain that pursuing this strategy helps shed light on one of the most controversial features of his philosophy of mathematics and natural science, viz., his theory of the a priori.
Keywords Cassirer  Neo-Kantianism  Marburg Neo-Kantianism  Substance and Function  Philosophy of Symbolic Forms  Psychology  A priori
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15173/jhap.v6i3.3437
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
Kants Theorie der Erfahrung.Hermann Cohen - 1871 - Berlin: Ferd. Dümmler.
Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism.R. Lanier Anderson - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):287-323.
Epistemology in the Aufbau.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):15 - 57.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Merleau‐Ponty on Painting and the Problem of Reflection.Emma C. Jerndal - 2021 - Wiley: European Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):74-89.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics.Thomas Mormann - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):151 - 181.
Ernst Cassirer’s Substanzbegriff Und Funktionsbegriff.Jeremy Heis - 2014 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (2):241-70.
On Cassirer's “Substance and Function”.H. J. Priestley - 1924 - Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 2 (1):58-63.
Ernst Cassirer's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry.Jeremy Heis - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):759 - 794.
The Present Position in Psychology.James Drever - 1932 - Philosophy 7 (27):311 - 319.
Interruptions: Levinas.George Kunz - 2006 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 37 (2):241-266.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #242,511 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,988 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes