Reply to James E. McClellan

Studies in Philosophy and Education 7 (4):341 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to James E. McClellan.Philip G. Smith - 1965 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 4 (1):75.
Newsome's “critique”(?): A reply.James E. McClellan - 1967 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 5 (2):284-286.
Reply to James E. McClellan.Carl Bereiter - 1975 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 9 (1):16.
Perestroika in Philosophy.Dorothy Spektorov McClellan & James E. McClellan - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (3):243-257.
II. why should the humanities be taught?James E. McClellan - 1958 - Journal of Philosophy 55 (23):997-1008.
Must we educate?James E. McClellan - 1975 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 9 (1):4-20.
Review article.James McClellan - 1996 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 15 (4):371-381.
To the editor.Van Cleve Morris James E. Mcclellan - 1966 - Educational Theory 16 (2):192-192.
The Roots of Reference.Thomas S. Costello James E. Mcclellan - 1976 - Educational Theory 26 (3):310-318.
Learned Societies.”.James E. Mcclellan Iii & Alan Charles Kors - 2003 - In Alan Charles Kors (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 371-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references