Standing up too close or back too far? A slanted history of close film analysis

In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Close Up 1927-1933.James Donald, Anne Friedberg & Laura Marcus - 1998 - Princeton University Press.
Environmental Ethics and Film.Pat Brereton - 2015 - New York: Routledge.
Reading Derrida close reading Lemov close reading close reading.Jordan Corson - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (3):240-250.
The Standing to Blame and Meddling.Maria Seim - 2019 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (2):7-26.
Kierkegaard, Compassion, and the Descent of Love.Kevin Hoffman - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):167-180.
Standing to epistemically blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):11355-11375.
The Coach/Athlete Relationship: How Close Is Too Close?Sheryle Drewe - 2002 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (2).
The Coach-Athlete Relationship: How Close Is Too Close?Sheryle Bergmann Drewe - 2002 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (2):174-181.
Close Encounters Not Close Enough. [REVIEW]Theodora Capaldo - 2011 - Society and Animals 19 (1):106-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references