In Mark C. Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 11. Oxford: (forthcoming)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Upon doing something generous for someone with whom you are close, some kind of reciprocity may be appropriate. But it often seems wrong to actually request reciprocity. This chapter explores the wrongness in making these requests, and why they can nevertheless appear appropriate. After considering several explanations for the wrongness at issue (involving, e.g. distinguishing oughts from obligation, the suberogatory, imperfect duties, and gift-giving norms), a novel proposal is advanced. The requests are disrespectful; they express that their agent insufficiently trusts the hearer to recognize their own reasons to reciprocate, and the close relationship between them morally requires this kind of trust. This proposal is articulated and situated in the recent discussion of the normativity of requests. The chapter concludes by explaining how these requests may appear appropriate. Agents in these relationships often have standing to make requests, though the standing is lacking in these particular cases.
|
Keywords | requests trust standing generosity gifts imperfect duties suberogatory |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame.Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):118-139.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Recognition, Needs and Wrongness.Arto Laitinen - 2009 - European Journal of Political Theory 8 (1):13-30.
Acts of Requesting in Dynamic Logic of Knowledge and Obligation.Tomoyuki Yamada - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):59-82.
Inviolability and Interpersonal Morality.Andrew Ross - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (1):69-82.
Chimpanzees Show More Understanding of Human Attentional States When They Request Food in the Experimenter’s Hand Than on the Table.Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):418-429.
Chimpanzees Show More Understanding of Human Attentional States When They Request Food in the Experimenter’s Hand Than on the Table.Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita - 2011 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 12 (3):418-429.
Reproductive Autonomy, the Non-Identity Problem, and the Non-Person Problem.Russell Disilvestro - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):59-67.
Wronging Future People: A Contractualist Proposal.Rahul Kumar - 2009 - In Gosseries Axel & Meyers L. (eds.), Intergenerational Justice. Oxford University Press. pp. 251--272.
Contractarianism and Secondary Direct Moral Standing for Marginal Humans and Animals.Julia Tanner - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (2):1-16.
In Search of the Missing Subject: Narrative Identity and Posthumous Wronging.Malin Masterton, Mats G. Hansson & Anna T. Höglund - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (4):340-346.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-12-22
Total views
445 ( #21,414 of 2,507,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,511 of 2,507,656 )
2019-12-22
Total views
445 ( #21,414 of 2,507,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,511 of 2,507,656 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads