- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Some Difficulties with Double Effect
Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):27-34 (1978)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
The Paradox of Self-Defense: Saving Oneself by Harming Another.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2009 - Lexington Books.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
Double-effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil.T. A. Cavanaugh - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The accomplishment of plans: a new version of the principle of double effect.Alexander R. Pruss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):49-69.
The double life of double effect.Allison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
Intention and responsibility in double effect cases.David K. Chan - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):405-434.
Intentions, foreseen consequences and the doctrine of double effect.Alison Hills - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):257 - 283.
Moral absolutism and the double-effect exception: Reflections on Joseph Boyle's who is entitled to double-effect?Alan Donagan - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):495-509.
An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect.Joseph Mangan - 1949 - Theological Studies 10:41-61.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-12-02
Downloads
32 (#490,373)
6 months
8 (#346,782)
2011-12-02
Downloads
32 (#490,373)
6 months
8 (#346,782)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Origin of the Justification of the Two-Wrongs Argument: A Conjecture.S. K. Wertz - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo