Double-effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil

New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

T. A. Cavanaugh defends double-effect reasoning (DER), also known as the principle of double effect. DER plays a role in anti-consequentialist ethics (such as deontology), in hard cases in which one cannot realize a good without also causing a foreseen, but not intended, bad effect (for example, killing non-combatants when bombing a military target). This study is the first book-length account of the history and issues surrounding this controversial approach to hard cases. It will be indispensable in theoretical ethics, applied ethics (especially medical and military), and moral theology. It will also interest legal and public policy scholars.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#896,762)

6 months
272 (#8,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Cavanaugh
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

Mindlessness.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
Doctrine of double effect.Alison McIntyre - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Protecting reasonable conscientious refusals in health care.Jason T. Eberl - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (6):565-581.
Three Cheers for Double Effect.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):125-158.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references