Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (1):42 – 51 (2010)

Andrew Martin
Goldsmiths College, University of London
The philosophical argument between Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus can be summarised in their conflicting accounts of skiing and swimming. For Sartre skiing exemplifies the struggle of existence and the angst of the alienated ego. For Camus, swimming represents some glimmering of collective harmony, the possibility of transcendence. Sartre's thinking is inflected by quantum theory and the 'steady state', whereas Camus is more of a wave theorist, with a lingering nostalgia for the 'primeval atom' and a fondness for peak experiences. Put together their separate ways of analysing consciousness suggest a two-phase account of cognition
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17511320903264206
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Myth of Sisyphus.Albert Camus - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (1):104-107.
L'Etre et le Néant.J. Sartre - 1946 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):75-78.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #304,907 of 2,499,060 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,060 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes