CE is not a conservative extension of E

Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The logic CE (for "Classical E") results from adding Boolean negation to Anderson and Belnap's logic E. This paper shows that CE is not a conservative extension of E

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#430,758)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edwin Mares
Victoria University of Wellington

References found in this work

Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Nuel D. Belnap & J. Michael Dunn.
The semantics of entailment — III.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):192 - 208.
Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1974 - Studia Logica 33 (2):183 - 194.

View all 6 references / Add more references