Marx on Aristotle

Review of Metaphysics 34 (2):351-367 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

MARX’s debt to Aristotle is acknowledged in part 1 of Capital, admittedly the most difficult and, as will be argued, the most fundamental part of his principal work. His principal work is the one which establishes that the labor theory of value holds not only in the state of nature, as for Locke, nor only in primitive society, as for Adam Smith, but also in the highest civilized society and, as against Ricardo, in such a way as to prove that the proletariat is and must be exploited but will and can never exploit. With the analysis and reduction of capital into labor, the possibility of freedom in this new meaning, which is merely asserted in the "humanism" of his earlier writings, is proven and secured with the necessity of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marx and Aristotle.Richard W. Miller - 1981 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 7:323.
Marx and Aristotle: A Kind of Consequentialism.Richard W. Miller - 1981 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (sup1):323-352.
From Marx to Aristotle, from Aristotle to Us.Cornelius Castoriadis - 1978 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 45.
Marx and the Ancients. [REVIEW]John F. Donovan - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (4):871-872.
The Concept of Labor: Marx and His Critics.Sean Sayers - 2007 - Science and Society 71 (4):431 - 454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
19 (#145,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references