God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):139-142 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The weak anthropic principle and the design argument.Joseph M. Zycinski - 1996 - Zygon 31 (1):115-130.
Modern biologists and the argument from design.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
Answering the biochemical argument from design.Kenneth R. Miller - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
God and design: the teleological argument and modern science.Neil A. Manson (ed.) - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. Routledge. pp. 25--53.
Book review: Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: The teleological argument and modern science. London and new York: Routledge, 2003. XVI and 376 pa $25.95. [REVIEW]Edward L. Schoen - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):139-142.
Perceiving design.Del Ratzsch - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
The meaning of design.John Leslie - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
Perceiving design.Del Ratzsch - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
The compatibility of darwinism and design.Peter van Inwagen - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
The appearance of design in physics and cosmology.Paul Davies - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
The design inference : Old wine in new wineskins.Robert O'Connor - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge. pp. 80--66.
God by design?Jan Narveson - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge. pp. 80--88.
Review of Neil Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. [REVIEW]Niall Shanks - 2004 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (1).
Too many universes.D. H. Mellor - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil A. Manson
University of Mississippi

Citations of this work

God, fine-tuning, and the problem of old evidence.Bradley Monton - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):405-424.
Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse.Klaas J. Kraay - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):355 - 368.
The fine-tuning argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Philosophy of religion.Charles Taliaferro - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why the big Bang singularity does not help the Kal M cosmological argument for theism.J. Brian Pitts - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):675-708.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references