- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The design inference : Old wine in new wineskins
In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 80--66 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
God by design?Jan Narveson - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 80--88.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Modern biologists and the argument from design.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Perceiving design.Del Ratzsch - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Perceiving design.Del Ratzsch - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
The meaning of design.John Leslie - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Answering the biochemical argument from design.Kenneth R. Miller - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
The compatibility of darwinism and design.Peter van Inwagen - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
The modern intelligent design hypothesis breaking rules.Michael Behe - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 277.
The appearance of design in physics and cosmology.Paul Davies - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
2009-01-28
Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Physical Order and the Existence of God.Iulian D. Toader - 2013 - In Balan Marin (ed.), Athens and/or Jerusalem: Essays on the Relationship Between Science and Religion. University of Bucharest Press. pp. 133-142.
Intelligent design in theological perspective.Niall Shanks & Keith Green - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):307 - 330.
The Pros and Cons of “Intelligent Design”.Martin Poulsom - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):177-195.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-grz79 uwo