Exploring the range of reported dream lucidity

Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 2:1-23 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Dream lucidity, or being aware that one is dreaming while dreaming, is not an all-or-none phenomenon. Often, subjects report being some variant of “a little lucid” as opposed to completely or not at all. As recent neuroimaging work begins to elucidate the neural underpinnings of lucid experience, understanding subtle phenomenological variation within lucid dreams is essential. Here, we focus on the variability of lucid experience by asking participants to report their awareness of the dream on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants implemented a combination of mnemonic training lucid dream induction methods at home for one week and provided detailed reports about their dream experiences each morning. Consistent with previous research, cognitive induction methods led to about half of participants reporting at least one lucid dream and about half of all dreams including some level of lucidity. However, we also show that induction success rate varies significantly depending on the minimum criteria for lucidity. Participants also reported how much they adhered to specific components of each induction method, and the amount of mnemonic rehearsal during a brief early awake period was predictive of lucidity level. Furthermore, lucidity levels were positively correlated with dream control, dream bizarreness, and next-morning positive affect. Lastly, we asked participants open-ended questions about why they chose particular levels of lucidity. We focus a qualitative discussion on responses to those “semi-lucid” dreams to explore why participants rate their dreams as having intermediate levels of awareness. Together, the present study explores the frequency of semi-lucid dreams, what they are, why they might arise, their correlates, and how they impact methodological concerns in lucid dreaming research.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dreams.Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Michelle Windt - 2007 - In D. Barrett & Patrick McNamara (eds.), The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers.
Insight: What Is It, Exactly? — A Commentary on Ursula Voss and Allan Hobson.Lana Kuhle - 2015 - In Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Windt (eds.), Open MIND. MIND group. pp. 1629-1641.


Added to PP

16 (#919,122)

6 months
8 (#521,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is Lucid Dreamless Sleep Really Lucid?Adriana Alcaraz-Sánchez - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (1):1-27.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references