The 2015 Sexual Offences Amendment Act: Laudable amendments in line with the Teddy Bear clinic case

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 8 (2):4 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two years ago the Constitutional Court invalidated provisions in the Sexual Offences Act which outlawed sexual conduct between adolescents. Parliament was ordered to fix the relevant provisions and to decriminalise consensual sexual activity between adolescents. In July 2015 the Amendment Act came into operation with the aim of revising the current Sexual Offences Act in line with the Constitutional Court judgment. This article evaluates some of the changes contained in the Amendment Act to determine its alignment with the ruling of the Constitutional Court. It also considers how the changes will impact the reporting obligations of health providers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Human Life Amendments Mean and Don't Mean.Timothy F. Murphy - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):47-48.
An antitakeover amendment for stakeholders?Nancy L. Meade, Robert M. Brown & Dana J. Johnson - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (15):1651-1659.
The Queen and the `Bolton Seven'.Nick Dearden - 1999 - Feminist Legal Studies 7 (3):317-332.
The Clinic and the Tearoom.Geoffrey Rees - 2013 - Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2):109-121.
The Unfairness of Risk-Based Possession Offences.Andrew Ashworth - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):237-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-02

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?