Expertise and error-making in chess

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to illustrate, in some detail, the phenomenon of chess expertise and the making of errors by chess experts. In doing so, this paper also aims to reveal the close relationship between expertise and error making in chess. Finally, the paper aims to show how understanding that integral relationship can assist in the creation of pedagogical methods that can minimize error making, while also maximizing expertise. The analysis may provide some assistance in the development of our understanding of expert epistemologies amongst the professions, and for reflection about the appropriateness of current pedagogical methods utilized in the education of those professions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On the philosophical dimensions of chess.Arto Siitonen - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):455 – 475.
The reviled art.Stuart Rachels - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press.
The role of rules in ethical decision making.Eugene C. Hargrove - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):3 – 42.
Linguistic competence and expertise.Mark Addis - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):327-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#695,360)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references