The Commitments of Naturalism – A Dialog

Abstract

As a worldview, naturalism depends on a set of cognitive commitments from which flow certain propositions about reality and human nature. These propositions in turn might have implications for how we live, for social policy, and for human flourishing. But the presuppositions, basis, and implications of naturalism are not uncontested, and indeed there’s considerable debate about them among naturalists themselves.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Introduction - the nature of naturalism.David Macarthur & Mario De Caro - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-20.
American Naturalism on Pantheism 1.Martin O. Yalcin - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):156 - 179.
Naturalism in question.Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.) - 2004 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
What Divides Us Today.Arthur E. Falk - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:45-49.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century.Robert Audi - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
27 (#578,323)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Macarthur
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references