Is Pascal's Wager self-defeating?

Sophia 39 (2):1-30 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf02822393

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pascal’s Wager and the Nature of God.Greg Janzen - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):331-344.
On four critiques of Pascal's Wager.Michael Martin - 1975 - Sophia 14 (1):1-11.
A game-theoretic analysis of pascal’s Wager.Ahmer Tarar - 2018 - Economics and Philosophy 34 (1):31-44.
"J. J. MacIntosh and S. O. Coval ", The Business of Reason. [REVIEW]Yvan Lamonde - 1970 - Dialogue 9 (1):101.
J. J. MacIntosh, "The Arguments of Aquinas: A Philosophical View." Reviewed by.Glenn B. Siniscalchi - 2020 - Philosophy in Review 40 (1):28-30.
Pascal's wager.Kevin Shaun Grumball - unknown
Pascal's wager.Michael Rota - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (4):e12404.
Pascal’s wager and the origins of decision theory: decision-making by real decision-makers.James Franklin - 2018 - In Paul F. A. Bartha & Lawrence Pasternack (eds.), Pascal’s Wager. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 27-44.
Daniel Garber: What Happens After Pascal's Wager: Living Faith and Rational Belief. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Burns - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):218-220.
Pascal's Challenge.Steven Merle Duncan - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#243,707)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack MacIntosh
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Pascal's Wager.Ian Hacking - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (2):186 - 192.
God’s lottery.Storrs McCall & D. M. Armstrong - 1989 - Analysis 49 (4):223 - 224.
Pascal's Wager is a possible bet (but not a very good one): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.
Duff and the Wager.Jeff Jordan - 1991 - Analysis 51 (3):174 - 176.
Infinite return: Two ways of wagering with Pascal.James Wetzel - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):139-149.

Add more references