Interpreting Kant, Molke S. Gram, ed. [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 16 (2):154-155 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For two hundred years, interpreting Kant has been regarded as a truly formidable task. But is the problem philosophical or philological? The answer which constitutes the raison d’être of this volume is that it is both. The introduction refers to “the need for the integration of philology and philosophy into philosophical semantics” and states that “This is also what makes the present undertaking distinctive”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Gram, Interpreting Kant. [REVIEW]D. L. C. Maclachlan - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (2):154-155.
Interpreting Kant correctly: On the Kant of the neo-Kantians.Manfred Kühn - 2009 - In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Reply to George Walsh: Rethinking Rand and Kant.R. Kevin Hill - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):195 - 204.
Interpreting Kant. [REVIEW]A. C. Genova - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):629-631.
Kant and the apriority of space.Daniel Warren - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (2):179-224.
Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. [REVIEW]Richard E. Aquila - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):591-593.
On Interpreting Kant’s Thinker as Wittgenstein’s ‘I’.Patricia Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):33-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-11

Downloads
15 (#944,758)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references