Review: Gram, Interpreting Kant [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 16 (2):154-155 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For two hundred years, interpreting Kant has been regarded as a truly formidable task. But is the problem philosophical or philological? The answer which constitutes the raison d’être of this volume is that it is both. The introduction refers to “the need for the integration of philology and philosophy into philosophical semantics” and states that “This is also what makes the present undertaking distinctive”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Kant correctly: On the Kant of the neo-Kantians.Manfred Kühn - 2009 - In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Interpreting Kant. [REVIEW]A. C. Genova - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):629-631.
Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. [REVIEW]Robert B. Louden - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (3):648-649.
Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. [REVIEW]Richard E. Aquila - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):591-593.
Kant's one world: Interpreting 'transcendental idealism'.Lucy Allais - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):655 – 684.
Property by agreement: Interpreting Kant's account of right.Marcus Verhaegh - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (4):687 – 717.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references