Education for Personal Life: John MacMurray on Why Learning to be Human Requires Emotional Discipline

Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (1):118-136 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I discuss the philosophy of John MacMurray, and in particular, his little-examined writings on discipline and emotion education. It is argued that discipline is a vital element in the emotion education MacMurray thought central to learning to be human, because for him it takes concerted effort to overcome the human tendency toward egocentricity. It is maintained that MacMurray's philosophy of education is of contemporary significance for at least two reasons. On the one hand it suggests an alternative vision for humanistic education. While liberal educationists such as Oakeshott and Peters stressed that the pursuit of knowledge and understanding was the main way in which persons could develop their humanity MacMurray instead emphasised that persons can only learn to become human by pursuing other-centred relationships. On the other hand his philosophy can also reveal the limitations in much contemporary debate in emotion education which critics (such as Ecclestone and Clack) suggest increasingly aims at little more than helping pupils feel better about themselves. According to MacMurray a genuine emotion education can enlarge humanity by supporting persons to feel and act for the sake of others rather than think about themselves. Despite sympathy for MacMurray's account of the purposes of education it is nonetheless concluded that the pursuit of knowledge as an end in itself does not necessarily constitute a negative expression of human agency (as MacMurray asserts)—but rather that the disciplined pursuit of knowledge may also form part of any education concerned to enrich human life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Macmurray's philosophy of the personal and the irreducibility of psychological persons.Jeff Sugarman - 2006 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26 (1-2):172-188.
Reason and emotion.John Macmurray - 1935 - London,: D. Appleton-Century company.
John Macmurray and Contextual Theology.Christopher Lind - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):383-400.
Why We Need the Arts: John Macmurray on Education and the Emotions.Esther McIntosh - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (1):47-60.
The form of the personal.John Macmurray - 1957 - [New York,: Harper. Edited by John Macmurray.
On General Education as a Discipline.Michael Uljens - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (4):291-301.
Vocation of the Artist.Thomas Ewens - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):329-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-22

Downloads
26 (#609,328)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy in Scotland and Scottish education.James MacAllister & Gale Macleod - 2016 - Ethics and Social Welfare 10 (3):197-210.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration.Peter Goldie - 2000 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Ethics and education.Richard Stanley Peters - 1966 - London,: Allen & Unwin.
Persons in relation.John Macmurray - 1961 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
The self as agent.John Macmurray - 1957 - London,: Faber.

View all 15 references / Add more references