Aristotle and the XΩΡΙΣΜΟΣ of Plato

Classical Quarterly 20 (2):72-79 (1926)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘All the difficulties in the theory of forms arise from their separation.’ This recurrent criticism of Aristotle's is, of course, one of the principal obstacles in the way of any reconstruction of the Platonic metaphysic. To begin with, it is flatly denied by Plato himself in the use of such words as μέθεξις, παρoυσία and κoινωνία. It must also be rejected by the orthodox account of the Forms which takes them to be immanent, constitutive principles in the world of everyday life, like a Law of Nature or the Concrete Universal of Hegel. Finally, modern philosophy has made it clear that this view of universals is right and necessary if thought and language are to exist, and it is therefore tempting to attribute it to Plato

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
16 (#902,419)

6 months
4 (#776,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.Miira Tuominen - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):852-895.
One Over Many: The Unitary Pluralism of Plato's World.Necİp Fİkrİ Alİcan - 2021 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
The Achilles of Proclus.Graeme Miles - 2022 - Classical Quarterly 72 (2):877-888.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references