Rights of Animals, Perceptions of Science, and Political Activism: Profile of American Animal Rights Activists

Science, Technology and Human Values 17 (4):438-458 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reports original research examining characteristics of the active followers of the American animal rights movement. Typical respondents were Caucasian, highly educated urban professional women approximately thirty years old with a median income of $33,000. Most activists think of themselves as Democrats or as Independents, and have moderate to liberal political views. They were often suspicious of science and made no distinctions between basic and applied science, or public versus private animal-based research. The research suggests that animal rights activism is in part a symbolic manifestation of egalitarian social and political views concerning scientific and technological change.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Activism as Integrity. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2008 - Philosophy Now (67):44-45.
In Defense of Animals.Peter Singer (ed.) - 2013 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Animal rights: what everyone needs to know.Paul Waldau - 2011 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Justification of Animal Rights Claim.Azam Golam - 2009 - Philosophy and Progress 43 (2):139-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
10 (#1,188,669)

6 months
4 (#776,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The historical roots of our ecological crisis.Lynn White Jr - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application, Belmont: Wadsworth Company.
The Common Sense of Science.J. Bronowski - 1951 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (7):266-266.

Add more references