No “Real” Experts: Unexpected Agreement Over Disagreement in STS and Philosophy of Science

Perspectives on Science 26 (6):722-735 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If an outsider should get an interest in the study of "Social Epistemology," that person would immediately find that there are in fact two identically labeled programs. One is represented by the journal of the same name and belongs to the field of Science and Technology Studies, the other is an offshoot of analytical philosophy, and is represented by such philosophers as Alvin Goldman. Not only will the interested outsider discover this, they will also find two different articles titled "Two Kinds of Social Epistemology" that point out this fact, one published in the philosophical journal Episteme and the other in the Social Epistemology Review and Reply...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1162/posc_a_00295

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Questioning Reliabilism as the Basis of Social Epistemology through a Case Study.Pierre Willaime - unknown
Responsibilism and the Analytic-Sociological Debate in Social Epistemology.Susan Dieleman - 2016 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 2 (2):1-14.
The case for a more truly social epistemology. [REVIEW]William J. Talbott - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):199–206.
The Case for a More Truly Social Epistemology.William J. Talbott - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):199-206.
Extended Knowledge and Social Epistemology.Spyrion Orestis Palermos & Duncan Pritchard - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (8):105-120.
Normativity, Expertise and Epistemological Paternalism in the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Alina O. Kostina - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):229-241.
Žinojimo socialumo problema šiuolaikinėje socialinėje epistemologijoje: Du požiūriai.Audronė Rimkutė - 2004 - Problemos 65.
To What Extent Could Social Epistemology Accept the Naturalistic Motto?Ilya Kasavin - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):351-364.
Epistemology and Science.Aldona Pobojewska & Michał Lachman - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (7-8):71-81.
Žinojimo Socialumo Problema Šiuolaikinėje Socialinėje Epistemologijoje: Du Požiūriai.Vardenis Pavardenis - 2004 - Problemos 65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-08

Downloads
36 (#432,454)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Moral disagreement and moral expertise.Sarah McGrath - 2009 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-108.

View all 16 references / Add more references