Improving on and assessing ethical guidelines for digital tracking and tracing systems for pandemics

Ethics and Information Technology 23 (S1):139-142 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

So-called digital tracking and tracing systems have been proposed as a means to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. There are ethical guidelines and evaluations of such systems available. As part of a research project, I will build on and critically evaluate the foundations of such guidelines. The goal is to provide both incremental improvements of the specific requirements for DTTSs and to present and discuss more fundamental challenge, the risk for indirect effects and slippery slopes. The nature of slippery slopes makes ethical guidelines more difficult since it requires a more complex analysis than, for example, using a checklist allows for.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-04

Downloads
23 (#680,480)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Björn Lundgren
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

References found in this work

Informed consent.Nir Eyal - 2018 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. Routledge.
Beyond the Concept of Anonymity: What is Really at Stake?Björn Lundgren - 2020 - In Kevin Macnish & Jai Galliott (eds.), Big Data and Democracy. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 201-216.

Add more references