Vocational Education

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 1097-1111 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter traces recent philosophical interest in vocational education from the beginnings of modern analytic philosophy of education in the 1960s through some of the major philosophical debates about vocational education that have emerged over the past half century. The shift in a good many countries towards so-called competence-based approaches along with the advent of the European Qualification Framework can be seen to have raised profound questions about vocational knowledge and the problems associated with the use of assessment and the international harmonization of occupational standards. There has been a revitalized interest in longstanding philosophical disputes relating to the knowing-how/knowing that distinction and the relationship between theory and practice. The chapter maps recent philosophical thinking on these issues and proposes some possible resolutions. The discussion concludes by indicating some apparent limitations of analytic philosophy, suggesting that there are other traditions which have the potential to provide a richer and more coherent account of the vocational enterprise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ryle on Knowing How and the Possibility of Vocational Education.Christopher Winch - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):88-101.
Ryle on knowing how and the possibility of vocational education.Christopher Winch - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):88-101.
Revisiting the liberal and vocational dimensions of university education.David Carr - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (1):1-17.
Philosophy of Vocational Education in China: A Historical Overview.Carsten Schmidtke & Peng Chen - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (3):432-448.
Distributive Justice and Vocational Education.John Halliday - 2004 - British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (2):151-165.
Principles and a Philosophy for Vocational Education.Melvin D. Miller - 1984 - National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Ohio State University.
Education, Work and Social Capital: Towards a New Conception of Vocational Education.C. Winch - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (4):449-450.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
4 (#1,624,035)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references