To challenge the world view or to flow with it? Teaching sustainable development in business schools

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (3):292-307 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the fundamental question of what ‘responsibility’ means to different sets of world views adopted implicitly by business students. The exploration adopts the stakeholder theory and three subsets of the Friedman mentality to explain how individuals may value sustainability initiatives. Subsequently, it explores whether it is better to flow with the dominant economic-driven world view as prescribed by the business school or to challenge it in order to cultivate business students with sustainability-driven values. The conclusion highlights implications for business and management education, as well as the role of entrepreneurship to promote sustainability values

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Barriers to Change.Terri Friel & Josetta McLaughlin - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:309-321.
From the business ethics course to the sustainable curriculum.Derek Owens - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1765 - 1777.
Developing Critical Thinking about the Role of Business as a Private Social Institution.Alain Lapointe & Corinne Gendron - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:307-312.
Teaching ethics cases: a pragmatic approach.Alan E. Singer - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (1):16-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-14

Downloads
32 (#473,773)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?