- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
God's Justified Knowledge and the Hard-Soft Fact Distinction.John R. Shook - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:69-73.
Soft libertarianism and hard compatibilism.Gary Watson - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (4):351-365.
Hard and soft accidental uniformities.Eduardo H. Flichman - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):31-43.
The ego has landed! The .05 level of statistical significance is soft (fisher) rather than hard (neyman/pearson).Lester E. Krueger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):207-208.
Leibnizian soft reduction of extrinsic denominations and relations.Ari Maunu - 2004 - Synthese 139 (1):143-164.
Is public health paternalism really never justified? A response to Joel Feinberg.Thaddeus Mason Pope - manuscript
On häyry and Airaksinen's 'hard and soft offers as constraints'.J. P. Day - 1990 - Philosophia 20 (3):321-323.
Why God's beliefs are not hard-type soft facts.David Widerker - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):77-88.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-02-04
Downloads
31 (#513,686)
6 months
5 (#628,512)
2009-02-04
Downloads
31 (#513,686)
6 months
5 (#628,512)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The social organisation of science as a question for philosophy of science.Jaana Eigi - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Tartu
Some comments on the inability of sociology of science to explain science.Steven Miller & Marcel Fredericks - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (1-2):73-86.
Some comments on the inability of sociology of science to explain science.Steven Miller & Marcel Fredericks - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (1-2):73-86.
References found in this work
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Princeton University Press.
Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge.Barry Barnes & David Bloor - 1982 - In Martin Hollis & Steven Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Blackwell.
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. [REVIEW]Jeffrey S. Poland - 1988 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
Review of Thomas S. Kuhn The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. [REVIEW]David Zaret - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (1):146.
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach by Ronald N. Giere. [REVIEW]Philip Kitcher - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):163-167.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo