Deductive-Nomological vs. Causal-Mechanistic Explanation: Relative Strengths and Weaknesses in Anthropological Explanation

Abstract

An examination of the comparative strengths and weaknesses of Carl Hempel's deductive-nomological approach and Wesley Salmon's causal mechanical approach to explanation within the context of anthropological research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Explanation.Julian Reiss - 2008 - In New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.
Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon & Anne Fagot-Largeault - 1989 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
The ontic conception of scientific explanation.Cory Wright - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:20-30.
Causation and Explanation.Stathis Psillos - 2002 - McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP.
The Deductive-Nomological Account of Metaphysical Explanation.Tobias Wilsch - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):1-23.
Contrastive Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1990 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:247-266.
Mechanistic explanation at the limit.Jonathan Waskan - 2011 - Synthese 183 (3):389-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-17

Downloads
1 (#1,897,693)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references