Ethical EU eJustice: elusive or illusionary?

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 4 (3):131-144 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

eJudicial cooperation is a goal of EU policy. It appears to offer procedural and technical ICT solutions to enhancing EU security. This paper outlines particular dilemmas posed by operationalising ejudicial cooperation within the EU and its member states, and assesses how political weakness is reconfigured as a problem of technical ethics. The application of biometrics and ICT based ejustice potentially bring the EU closer to the citizen without closing the confidence and trust deficit. The paper first outlines three political dilemmas of ejudicial cooperation: political competence, public accountability, and globalisation imperatives. It examines the rationale for introducing biometric IDs, highlighting a general problem of ejudicial cooperation and egovernance which aggravate the trust deficit. Then, it assesses the technical and managerial procedures to ethical practices for quality justice and security to combat the trust deficits which elude open public accountability and compromise trust.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-19

Downloads
12 (#1,115,280)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethical reflections on the digital divide.Herman T. Tavani - 2003 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 1 (2):99-108.
Using genetic information while protecting the privacy of the soul.James H. Moor - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):257-263.
A foundation for understanding online trust in electronic commerce.Beverly Kracher, Cynthia L. Corritore & Susan Wiedenbeck - 2005 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 3 (3):131-141.

View all 9 references / Add more references